3 ms·
Not the best UX for readers IMO. That defeats the purpose of a RSS "reader".
by longnguyen 4y ago
Not the best UX for readers IMO. That defeats the purpose of a RSS "reader".
- vel0city 4y agoI still see a lot of value of having a tool that aggregates new items and snippets from all the content creators I enjoy, even if it's only previews/snippets in the tool. It shows me there's new content and if it's content I might be interested in. Also, it seems to me one could provide authentication tokens I'm the request for the feed. I don't see why one couldn't have a complete stream for subscribers and a minimal stream for previews for the unauthenticated requests.
- reaperducer 4y agoNot the best UX for readers IMO. That defeats the purpose of a RSS "reader". Works fine with the New York Times. The Times RSS feed includes a headline and a summary. If I'm interested in the article, I press F19 and it opens in my browser. Since I'm a subscriber, I'm logged in already, and it just appears. Pressing one button doesn't seem like much of a burden.