2 ms·
> better content, well sourced, well written and quantifiable intentional I've not seen AI create "better content" than even a moderately competent human, let
by Veen 4y ago
> better content, well sourced, well written and quantifiable intentional
I've not seen AI create "better content" than even a moderately competent human, let alone an expert writer and researcher. How do you know AI content is well-sourced when it's generated by an AI which makes it up based on a statistical model? Well-written is somewhat subjective, but ChatGTP is repetitive, overly verbose, and the opposite of intentional.
AI content will be great for repetitive copy like eCommerce descriptions, simple business and sports reports, and maybe API documentation, but it won't replace human writers in most contexts humans care about.
- seydor 4y agoCgpt is great at writing like a good copywriter, which is already above average human. When journalists lose their advantage, it becomes a matter of putting out there novel ideas, which models can do, too. The 'journalism' of the future will be basically curation of ideas. And if we have an overabundance of good content then attention will shift away from it because it gets boring.
- Veen 4y agoI am a professional copywriter and technical writer, so I have a dog in this race. But I don't agree that Cgpt is anywhere near a professional standard. It can produce mostly coherent and correct English, but not concise, creative, or empathetic English. It's good enough to replace human writing in some scenarios, but far from all.