5 ms·
There's a flip side to this argument in that more failing endeavors would be allowed to exist for longer, thus draining productive resources from more worthy en
by starkd 4y ago
There's a flip side to this argument in that more failing endeavors would be allowed to exist for longer, thus draining productive resources from more worthy endeavors.
- vidarh 4y agoI don't think so. It's not cheaper to run a company in Norway than the US, and cost of living is high, and the fact we could've shut the company down and get more money meant we only kept running it because we were hoping to make more money rather than out of fear of where we'd be if it failed. The benefits if anything serves as an incentive to give up failing ventures sooner.