4 ms·
In which case, there would be evidence of that. Prosecutors are notorious for wanting the biggest fish out there. While their might be bigger players that are g
by jasonlotito 4y ago
In which case, there would be evidence of that. Prosecutors are notorious for wanting the biggest fish out there. While their might be bigger players that are getting away with this, it's also not unreasonable to think that it happened as the evidence shows.
Basically, rather than make stuff up, I'd rather go with what the evidence shows and what can be proven. It's easy to hide in a big company, and it's at a bigger company where it's a lot easier to abuse your position without anyone else, including higher ups, knowing.
- Zpalmtree 4y agothey just decided to track journalists for fun with no-one telling them to? seems pretty unlikely to me.
- bfgoodrich 4y ago[dead]
- jasonlotito 4y ago> they just decided to track journalists for fun with no-one telling them to? That's not what I suggested in the slightest. Stop lying. > seems pretty unlikely to me. Sure, because I imagine they didn't just do it for fun. But that doesn't mean a more senior person has to be involved. Back it up with evidence. Your feelings are worthless. I'm right, and you are wrong.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]