4 ms·
Not to be too negative here but... why? You'd be creating something syntax-compatible with Java, but where you wouldn't be able to use any existing Java code &
by garblegarble 4y ago
Not to be too negative here but... why? You'd be creating something syntax-compatible with Java, but where you wouldn't be able to use any existing Java code & unable to use most of the interesting features of Java (even string concatenation is handled by instantiating a new StringBuilder on your behalf by javac). Aren't you just reinventing a worse C at that point?
- bullen 4y agoSee my other 2 responses. On mobile here would reference on PC.
- usrusr 4y agoWhat would be the point of that things relationship with java though? Is it somehow important that the bytecode run by a tiny vm that is apparently distributed alongside could also run on a proper JVM?
- bullen 4y agoJavac, I don't want to write a compiler. The bytecode is only meant to run in my VM.