> Maybe it's not that the government doesn't have power, but more like the government's power has become a tool for the rich and their corporations due to their

> Maybe it's not that the government doesn't have power, but more like the government's power has become a tool for the rich and their corporations due to their larger influence. That's why you need to reduce government power. Socialism do the opposite. > Why is this true? Anyone could state the opposite without proof: that corrupted companies are more effective and thrive. It's the definition of corruption: you gain personal benefits in cost of organization you work in. Why would I prove the definition? > Their outsized wealth owns things that does that for them. Yeah... everything just happens on its own. Surely no one ever bankrupted by investing in stocks.