3 ms·
Sorry, portable was a poor word here. Since I'm using Linux, being built in makes it easy for me to use. But if samba shipped as a small static executable that
by anderspitman 4y ago
Sorry, portable was a poor word here. Since I'm using Linux, being built in makes it easy for me to use. But if samba shipped as a small static executable that would be even easier.
- ilyt 4y agoI guess you could shove it into container. But SMB in general is complicated mess that only gets more complicated for backward compatibility sake. Comprehensive implementation almost by definition have to be complex. Small "local users only" implementation would certainly be welcome but I don't see the benefits of keeping it in kernel.