He looks at differing error rates for GET/DELETE/PUT to S3. This will presumably include any failures on the network path from the client to the server. Might

He looks at differing error rates for GET/DELETE/PUT to S3. This will presumably include any failures on the network path from the client to the server. Might that be enough to explain the higher rate of failed PUTs? Would anyone expect the effective network path from them to a well-known service like S3 to be noticeably asymmetric (at the levels of failure mentioned in the article)? Most consumers' 1st hop (ADSL or cable) is asymmetric in bandwidth - does that imply the ISP is doing different sums in terms of capacity planning which might cause a difference in packet loss? Does this asymmetry also exist outside of consumer 1st hop connections? Do modern network shapers prioritise download ACK traffic (needed to give the customers those blazing download speeds) over uploaded data (bloody file-sharers)? Lastly - given packet loss as measured by ping includes packets lost up or down, I guess there is no way to measure these independently without some co-operating code at the far end?