3 ms·
Isn't that just a restriction on people holding a political office of some kind? "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person hol
by noblethrasher 15y ago
Isn't that just a restriction on people holding a political office of some kind?
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State"
- toyg 15y agoUk honours are titles (Commander of the British Empire, etc).
- ugh 15y agoI think “And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them …” is where the question is coming from. Who is them in that sentence? The United States? And if that is so it seems only those in the United States holding an Office of Profit or Trust (whatever that means) are exempted. Citizenhood doesn't seem to come into play.
- OstiaAntica 15y agoAmerica was founded as an egalitarian republic, free from the aristocratic tyranny of Europe. The purpose of that provision was to keep formal aristocracy out of America, and to keep the U.S. government from adopting similar ranks and privileges here. An American cannot accept knighthood.
- protomyth 15y agoDug a little deeper: seems Afroyim v. Rusk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroyim_v._Rusk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroyim_v._Rusk says something different about the average citizen. There was an amendment that did not get ratified ( http://www.heraldica.org/topics/usa/usnob.htm http://www.heraldica.org/topics/usa/usnob.htm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_of_Nobility_Amendment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_of_Nobility_Amendment ). I remember Ike's knighthood was honorary, but he was elected President.