7 ms·
The curious case of slowing US growth for Android
- mda 15y agoWhen someone comments about growth percentages, most of the time either he doesn't know what he is talking about or is intentionally or subconsciously interpreting numbers to misguide.
- foobarbazetc 15y agoExcept that Asymco is one of the most trusted analysts in the mobile space.
- johncomelately 15y agoCitation needed (NB Gruber is not a suitable arbiter of trustworthiness)
- mda 15y agoThen he is probably of the second type. His analysis reeks of bias and has glaring problems.
- georgemcbay 15y agoIf 91 million people already have smartphones (I don't know if that is true, I'm taking the linked article at face value), shouldn't we expect growth to be slowing? There are 310 million people who live in the US and not everyone in that 310 million is a target customer for a smartphone (young kids, older folks, people who just don't like cellphones). Based on nothing but common sense it seems fairly obvious to me that growth will continue but at a slowing pace -- the market isn't saturated, but much of the low-hanging fruit is snatched up.
- beatle 15y agoThis is not coincidence. 1) the iPhone's availability on Sprint (Oct 2011) 2) HTC revenue dips 30% (November 2011)
- yason 15y agoSo, Android's market share and position has stabilized. No big deal. As the Android phones get cheaper and cheaper, they will invade the low-end mobile phone segment in masses and gain some further additional growth from there. But only some. The thing is, when nearly everyone, including non-computer-savvy people, has an Android phone, it becomes an infrastructure in itself and in its own ubiquity a platform never seen before. Just think what you can do with that if you're a service provider.
- schraeds 15y agoSomething other than selling apps (since that only seems to work a fraction as well on Android as it does iOS). Ohh, I know. Install the full suite of CarrierIQ sw?
- alanfalcon 15y agoIs the cost of owning an Android phone going to ever be significantly reduced from where it is now? The data plans that are necessary to use Android as a smartphone are surely the vast majority of the cost of ownership, and carriers are going to charge what they're going to charge for those.
- bergie 15y agoThere could be cheaper data plans (with lower bandwidth, capped amount of transfers, whatever). I'm always astonished to hear how much plans cost in the US.
- riahi 15y agoData point: Last I checked, Verizon only offered 4 phones that do not require a data plan. Everything else they offer is Android, BB, iOS, and maybe WinPhone. Even their semismart Samsung phones require some $15 data plan. At least when walking into a Verizon store, your perceived choice was android or android; everything else is plopped into a corner. I wonder if they will be successful in converting the remaining feature phone customers by simply removing that option in the future. Is the same thing happening on other carriers?