I do think a careful and deliberate parsing of what he said is necessary. The rage machine likes to distort. "Last night, car carrying lil X in LA was followed

I do think a careful and deliberate parsing of what he said is necessary. The rage machine likes to distort. "Last night, car carrying lil X in LA was followed by crazy stalker (thinking it was me), who later blocked car from moving & climbed onto hood. Legal action is being taken against Sweeney & organizations who supported harm to my family." So for the scorecard: Stalker: yes Has to do with Musk: yes, it's his family Didn't have anything to do with tracking his plane: Never made that claim. " legal action.... Taken against.... Who supported harm to my family" (I would add he could have used the words "supported potential harm) Didn't happen in the way that musk described: he didn't describe how it happened. (unless from another source) I think this is a good example of how going to original sources, not letting others prime opinions, and careful parsing of words is necessary in this world so as to not become a pawn in the game of outrage.