3 ms·
SantaCoder's impressive but that's probably misleading. It's reported that incoder doesn't generate as diverse a set of solutions but does do better at the ones
by Vetch 4y ago
SantaCoder's impressive but that's probably misleading. It's reported that incoder doesn't generate as diverse a set of solutions but does do better at the ones it generates. This means it performs well at a lower number of tries when compared to other similar models, which is what matters in practice. The numbers reported here required many trials.
With a fuller context and just a handful of tries, it's unlikely that 6.7B version of incoder will be outperformed by SantaCoder.
- moyix 4y agoThe amount of context is dictated by the benchmark, but I agree it would be good to see what the pass@1 and pass@10 numbers are – if the raw data is available somewhere that can easily be computed.