3 ms·
We would have great scientific data by now how the deadly nuclear cloud isn't actually that deadly. But it would have caused panic and that wouldn't have been
by panick21_ 4y ago
We would have great scientific data by now how the deadly nuclear cloud isn't actually that deadly.
But it would have caused panic and that wouldn't have been good.
- LargoLasskhyfv 4y agoI'm not so sure about that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ronald_Reagan#2011_deployment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ronald_Reagan#2011_deploym... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Essex_(LHD-2)#2011 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Essex_(LHD-2)#2011 Some searching for 'Fukushima US-NAVY cancer' will bring up endless stuff from all sorts of sites. The thing is, regardless of the sites reputations, there is a signal that those ships took a large dose, because some of their sailors claim their sudden leukemia was caused by that. I don't know. Can one call that psychosomatic? Did they sniff too much JP-7 instead? IMO that signal is too strong to be disregarded.