3 ms·
A whole region where 170 000 people lived was evacuated, some of them were not able to return for years. That has a cost as well, one that is hard to quantify.
by wasmitnetzen 4y ago
A whole region where 170 000 people lived was evacuated, some of them were not able to return for years. That has a cost as well, one that is hard to quantify.
Replacing nuclear with coal is obviously a bad idea. But replacing it with hydro, wind, solar power is so much better.
- insane_dreamer 4y agoI don't have the numbers but I'm pretty sure that more people have died from hydro (dams collapsing) than nuclear. Three Gorges Dam displaced over 1 million people. Not saying hydro is bad, but I'm not sure that nuclear is worse. Solar and wind are the best as they seem to have few downsides providing the conditions are right .