4 ms·
I touched on this topic when this all bubbled over a week or so ago [0]. I got down-voted for somehow implying a comparison between H Epstein's pedophilia etc t
by samhuk 4y ago
I touched on this topic when this all bubbled over a week or so ago [0]. I got down-voted for somehow implying a comparison between H Epstein's pedophilia etc to SBF's financial crimes (which, looking back, was a rather hilarious and bizarre conclusion some drew).
YMMV. I wish you luck!
IMHO, I think that he doesn't have enough incriminating information about political figures to be "hit-able". He must have some information about the Democrats' shady financials, likely going way up, but let's face it, we all know that already. This contrasts H Epstein, who likely knew which political figures were pedophiles, sexual predators, and all that horrific business, which is far worse and likely led to the "anomalous events" that occurred during H Epstien's arrest.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33963097 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33963097
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> must have some information about the Democrats' shady financials, likely going way up There is zero chance he has inside insight into anything. D.C. is filled with new money throwing around millions. The point isn’t to get access. It’s to convince the politically unconnected that they have access. They get a photo, the candidate gets cash.