3 ms·
I think this is a wonderful dataset for teaching and will certainly try to include it in the assignments I write. Other datasets I tried: Fashion MNIST has so
by jszymborski 4y ago
I think this is a wonderful dataset for teaching and will certainly try to include it in the assignments I write.
Other datasets I tried:
Fashion MNIST has so many mislabels and also is pretty trivial to separate with UMAP alone
Google's QuickDraw is better than MNIST, but I also haven't tested it against e.g. log. regression.
Of course there is CIFAR but those images hardly look like images. I can't classify half of them.