4 ms·
I don't see the analogy. you asserted a finite set of premises but didn't prove the implication at all? so why would the conclusion be valid?
by nh23423fefe 4y ago
I don't see the analogy. you asserted a finite set of premises but didn't prove the implication at all? so why would the conclusion be valid?
- sobriquet9 4y agoMy point is that if all I need is to convince my audience, I may be able to make them believe the flawed proof. In this example the flaw is intentionally obvious, but there are other examples where the flaw is more subtle.