3 ms·

https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/files/White_Supremacy_Culture.pdf https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/fil... - pag

https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/files/White_Supremacy_Culture.pdf https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/fil... - page 7 for objectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMepYJhI7HU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMepYJhI7HU - for non-readers https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology/graduate/intersection-science-and-racism https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology/graduate/intersection-sc... https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/science-technology/indigenous-science.html https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services... https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01312-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01312-4

affgrff2 4y ago
Thanks, I think I understand your question better now. I guess Feyerabend's point is not that there are multiple valid opinions about the world but rather multiple adequate ways on finding (maybe universal) truth about the world. The frameworks you are referencing however seem to emphasize that there is no such thing as objective truth (and that claiming so might even be promoting white supremacy or racism). So I don't see how it would support it.