4 ms·
Are they really that much more expensive? Also, wouldn’t that provide more actual jobs for PHd’s instead of competing for a scant number of jobs? Furthermore, I
by cudgy 4y ago
Are they really that much more expensive? Also, wouldn’t that provide more actual jobs for PHd’s instead of competing for a scant number of jobs? Furthermore, I do not believe that the costs of undergraduate education are driven by professor salaries; I suspect there are other drivers like administrative overhead and overbuilt facilities.
- lapcat 4y ago> Are they really that much more expensive? Yes. From the article: "If the deal is approved by union members, graduate students would receive a minimum stipend of $34,000 by October 2024—a raise of $13,000 for some students". So as I said, professors are vastly more expensive. > Also, wouldn’t that provide more actual jobs for PHd’s instead of competing for a scant number of jobs? Yes. But it wouldn't do anything to save money on undergraduate education. > Furthermore, I do not believe that the costs of undergraduate education are driven by professor salaries; I suspect there are other drivers like administrative overhead and overbuilt facilities. Then what's the objection to higher stipends for PhD students?
- cudgy 4y agoWhy pay higher stipends if the students are no longer performing professorial duties? It may be the case that they are still warranted, but fewer duties means more learning and opportunities to earn money part-time in coops or private companies.
- tosc 4y ago> I suspect there are other drivers like administrative overhead and overbuilt facilities. Right, and this is why they are trying to underpay teaching staff. There is no problem with “whiny” PhDs. The problem is with overpaid self-dealing administrators betraying the purpose of the institution.