4 ms·

How does his argument work with the current belief that objectivity and the scientific method is white supremacist oppression? Does his argument support the "al

How does his argument work with the current belief that objectivity and the scientific method is white supremacist oppression? Does his argument support the "alternate ways of knowing" that are being pushed as "indigenous science"?

bannedbybros 4y ago
[dead]
kirkules 4y ago
I have not seen this view expressed in this way except by people who do not support it. Do you remember or know any examples I could check out?
- _dain_ 4y ago
  https://nitter.1d4.us/realchrisrufo/status/1579120384519307265 https://nitter.1d4.us/realchrisrufo/status/15791203845193072...
affgrff2 4y ago
Please help me understand. Who currently believes this and more meta, which people believe that people believe this and who in reality are those groups?
- jdmtheNth 4y ago
  https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/files/White_Supremacy_Culture.pdf https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/fil... - page 7 for objectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMepYJhI7HU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMepYJhI7HU - for non-readers https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology/graduate/intersection-science-and-racism https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology/graduate/intersection-sc... https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/science-technology/indigenous-science.html https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services... https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01312-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01312-4
  - affgrff2 4y ago
    Thanks, I think I understand your question better now. I guess Feyerabend's point is not that there are multiple valid opinions about the world but rather multiple adequate ways on finding (maybe universal) truth about the world. The frameworks you are referencing however seem to emphasize that there is no such thing as objective truth (and that claiming so might even be promoting white supremacy or racism). So I don't see how it would support it.

bannedbybros 4y ago

[dead]

kirkules 4y ago

I have not seen this view expressed in this way except by people who do not support it. Do you remember or know any examples I could check out?

_dain_ 4y ago
https://nitter.1d4.us/realchrisrufo/status/1579120384519307265 https://nitter.1d4.us/realchrisrufo/status/15791203845193072...

affgrff2 4y ago

Please help me understand. Who currently believes this and more meta, which people believe that people believe this and who in reality are those groups?

jdmtheNth 4y ago
https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/files/White_Supremacy_Culture.pdf https://www.thc.texas.gov/public/upload/preserve/museums/fil... - page 7 for objectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMepYJhI7HU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMepYJhI7HU - for non-readers https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology/graduate/intersection-science-and-racism https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology/graduate/intersection-sc... https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/science-technology/indigenous-science.html https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services... https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01312-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01312-4
- affgrff2 4y ago
  Thanks, I think I understand your question better now. I guess Feyerabend's point is not that there are multiple valid opinions about the world but rather multiple adequate ways on finding (maybe universal) truth about the world. The frameworks you are referencing however seem to emphasize that there is no such thing as objective truth (and that claiming so might even be promoting white supremacy or racism). So I don't see how it would support it.