4 ms·
Hmm, if someone "defects" wikipedia and doesn't edit it, no big deal. But there absolutely are edit wars and battles of authority and admin bans etc.
by Gravityloss 4y ago
Hmm, if someone "defects" wikipedia and doesn't edit it, no big deal.
But there absolutely are edit wars and battles of authority and admin bans etc.
- robertlagrant 4y agoIndeed. Hence my final phrase :)
- 082349872349872 4y agoOK, so what model of overall cooperation would avoid Wikipedia drama? (having seen humanity's response to Covid, I'm not willing to admit "the spirit of full cooperation will bloom as defecting behaviour withers away" as axiomatic. But I am curious as to what you have in mind?)
- robertlagrant 4y agoI don't have an alternative for Wikipedia. I'm saying we shouldn't lean into any (always seductive) way of thinking that demonises people who disagrees with our one true way of doing things. People should be herded cats; neither wild cats nor herded sheep.
- 082349872349872 4y agoAgreed. What terms might be better than the game-theoretic Cooperator and Defector, then?