4 ms·
ATT had something very similar in my area. I used to go to the store to pay. They would charge me 3 dollars to pay in cash. It was outrageous. They eventually
by 97s 15y ago
ATT had something very similar in my area. I used to go to the store to pay. They would charge me 3 dollars to pay in cash.
It was outrageous. They eventually dropped the charge along with the ability to pay in store.
- erichocean 15y agoMy favorite is that Wells Fargo charges $5 to cash a check drawn on their bank, at their own bank, if you don't have an account with them. This is true even if the check is for, say $10, or even just $2. AFAIK they still have this policy today.
- philipmorg 15y agoIn one case, a Wells Fargo bank flat out refused to cash a Wells Fargo check. They said I could open an account there and then they'd be happy to honor the check. Of course.
- megablast 15y agoYou didn't stop going to them, along with most other people. Why should they change?
- jeffdavis 15y agoTo be fair, it's clear why ATT would want to avoid handling cash in the store. Most people probably don't do that, it's probably small amounts, and they probably spent more offering that service than they collected. The strange thing about verizon was that they wanted to charge a fee when there was no apparent prompting, for one of the more convenient (for verizon as well as customer) methods.