4 ms·

I get where you are coming from, but if she was CEO, she was responsible for her actions (and inactions) in that position. Letting some people off is not just

I get where you are coming from, but if she was CEO, she was responsible for her actions (and inactions) in that position. Letting some people off is not just and the various narratives these people are all spinning to avoid responsibility for their actions are ALL equally BS.

benjaminwootton 4y ago
As the CEO of a company then you are still subservient to the chairman, board, investors, CEO of the group etc. Its a difficult dynamic at the level when you start to carry civil and criminal liability too.
csomar 4y ago
Of course. That’s the price you pay for getting a high salary and big benefits. And that’s why the effective beneficiary cares about who owns the things or who actually really control the thing. I have seen this dynamic way too many times (especially with spouses being “CEOs” or directors)