3 ms·
Or alternatively realise that there isn't a fixed amount of money and therefore if 'rich people' want to count their coins let them do so. (i) it solves the ca
by neilwilson 4y ago
Or alternatively realise that there isn't a fixed amount of money and therefore if 'rich people' want to count their coins let them do so.
(i) it solves the capital accumulation problem
(ii) you can accommodate the hoarding by guaranteeing people a job at the living wage, which then injects the right amount of new money, both temporally and spatially, to offset the hoarding.
Tax has nothing to do with raising money. Tax is about reducing the capacity of the private sector to hire people so the public sector can hire them instead. If there is unemployment then the public sector hasn't hired enough people or taxes are too high/ineffective.
It's never about money. It's always about stuff.
Here's how it works[1]
[1]: https://new-wayland.com/blog/how-the-job-guarantee-fixes-mainstream-macro/ https://new-wayland.com/blog/how-the-job-guarantee-fixes-mai...
- TheOtherHobbes 4y agoThere isn't a fixed amount of money. And taxes are only incidentally about public sector hiring. There is (more or less) a fixed amount of power. Taxes doesn't raise money, but they do redistribute and decentralise power, making it harder for the very rich to dominate economic and social strategy for their own ends.
- neilwilson 4y agoExcept that if you have power, then by definition you can stop people redistributing it. Otherwise you don't actually have power. That concept is another fallacy of composition. Taxes are there to reduce the capacity of the private sector to hire by reducing monetary flow. Without that you will get inflation.