3 ms·

I don't see how that's a Lightroom alternative. It would take forever to process a batch of RAW photos that way if it is more than a couple of photos. I'm also

I don't see how that's a Lightroom alternative. It would take forever to process a batch of RAW photos that way if it is more than a couple of photos. I'm also confused how Apple Photos would know what adjustments you made to the RAW in an external program, or how you would go about exporting non-RAW files in this scenario. Something like Capture One is much better suited as a replacement for Lightroom. I wish that Apple had a Lightroom alternative, but they got rid of Aperture, so... they're probably not interested in competing in this space again any time soon.

CharlesW 4y ago
> It would take forever to process a batch of RAW photos that way if it is more than a couple of photos. Apple Photos has great built-in RAW support, so no processing is needed. If I want to use a different RAW processor, that's straightforward as well. > I wish that Apple had a Lightroom alternative, but they got rid of Aperture, so… Check out RAW Power¹ (macOS and iOS), created by the former lead of the Aperture and iPhoto engineering teams. It's able to use your Apple Photos library directly. ¹ https://www.gentlemencoders.com/ https://www.gentlemencoders.com/