4 ms·
>it was because of the expertly used film grain That is an interesting way to frame it. I see it more as an expert use of 35mm film and lighting, and the grain
by jibe 4y ago
>it was because of the expertly used film grain
That is an interesting way to frame it. I see it more as an expert use of 35mm film and lighting, and the grain is just present because it is inherent to the medium.
- knaik94 4y agoWhen going from film to digital, you have to modify the source noise in some way and there's no way to avoid it. A 1 to 1 transfer is possible, but I haven't come across any. Instead I have seen so many times where films either denoised too much or added too much artificial grain during the transfer. Starting from a very good source definitely helped, but film is limited in certain ways that digital isn't. Additionally, color grading for HDR10 and Dolby Vision was done. I didn't think that HDR would make a huge difference in a mostly black and white film but it does. The second picture comparison is what encouraged me to rewatch the movie again. [1] [1] https://www.hdnumerique.com/dossiers/962-test-4k-ultra-hd-blu-ray-schindler.html https://www.hdnumerique.com/dossiers/962-test-4k-ultra-hd-bl...
- ilyt 4y agoIt honestly looks more like the first one was recorded with slightly higher brightness, every "old" scene is brighter