> I mean, isn't that the same thing? Not at all. The claim about not being stumped was made in response to criticism that Go is unusable without generics. Said

> I mean, isn't that the same thing? Not at all. The claim about not being stumped was made in response to criticism that Go is unusable without generics. Said criticism was probably made up, but I guess it was still interesting enough to garner the response that ultimately brought us here. > That would be blub the other way around. Seems like blub the same way around. Indeed, the blub paradox itself is paradoxical. > the more languages (that are actually different) you have used, the more unhappy you are with every single existing language. And the more you really appreciate just what Go has done by taking an engineering approach and not an academic approach.