3 ms·
Given PixiJS is a 2D renderer by default I wouldn’t expect performance as high as Three.js. Pixi3D seems to be a way to add the occasional 3D object to your 2D
by pontilanda 4y ago
Given PixiJS is a 2D renderer by default I wouldn’t expect performance as high as Three.js. Pixi3D seems to be a way to add the occasional 3D object to your 2D drawn application.
- jnsmalm 4y agoPixiJS renders 2D exactly the same as 3D is rendered using Three/Babylon, it's all WebGL (with vertex data, textures and shaders) in the end. Pixi3D should perform very similar to the other 3D renders on the web.