3 ms·
I wonder if anything from this forum thread [1], which is summarized here [2], got implemented. [1] https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/9132 https://forum.nim-lang.or
by tiffanyh 4y ago
I wonder if anything from this forum thread [1], which is summarized here [2], got implemented.
[1] https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/9132 https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/9132
[2] https://gist.github.com/j-james/08cd36b7475d461d6291416381ce98ad https://gist.github.com/j-james/08cd36b7475d461d6291416381ce...
- treeform 4y agoLooking at the summery [2] many of the things got implemented, just a quick list: * Remove backwards-compatible switches / deprecated features * Remove every memory option except orc, arc, none, go * Shrink stdlib * Comprehensive stdlib cleanup * Support default values in object construction * Language features designed for parallelism * Lock in --threads:on and --mm:arc/--mm:orc * Official support for overloadable enum names * Robust concurrency/multithreading * Fix bugs!
- cb321 4y ago> * Remove every memory option except orc, arc, none, go I feel like memory option removals remain more "planned/maybe revisable/maybe not really agreed upon as the right direction" with only a change of AMM defaults happening in 2.0. (I'm also not sure what value in removal really is except less to learn about/more inflexibility..). The rest of the list seems represented, though.