3 ms·
Fun idea, but why did they travel in different directions for each test? The environment and line of sight are everything in this type of testing, so it doesn't
by PragmaticPulp 4y ago
Fun idea, but why did they travel in different directions for each test? The environment and line of sight are everything in this type of testing, so it doesn't make sense to wander in different random directions and then try to compare numbers.
For the final test they went up in elevation and had what appears to be line of sight back to the base station. That alone was probably more impactful than any antenna change.
- dylan604 4y agoJust a guess, but if you know about how far your anticipating getting a signal, you can draw a circle on the map and pick the direction that will give you the best chances. They clearly state that line of sight is suggested. At one distance, there might be obstructions along the same line as a previous test. They could also just be bored with the first path and looking for something different. >For the final test they went up in elevation and had what appears to be line of sight back to the base station. That alone was probably more impactful than any antenna change. For the final test, they were 6.4 miles away. If you think the elevation was the only thing that helped, you're just being obtuse. Is it deliberate? I'm asking for my friend Andy Dufresne