4 ms·

Sorry, but this falls into the category of "not even wrong". Writing "evolution is just a theory" implies that you have a foundational misunderstanding of termi

Sorry, but this falls into the category of "not even wrong". Writing "evolution is just a theory" implies that you have a foundational misunderstanding of terminology that means it's not worth engaging with the rest of your comment until that is cleared up. You may want to start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory A summary from that page: > A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses"

mavili 4y ago
Your comment tells me you have preached this a few times that you've memorised it. I say this because you added "just" when I actually didn't have that in my comment. Read again. "Evolution is a theory and not observable" is not the same as "evolution is JUST a theory". Theory, scientific theory, whatever, it's not fact, is it? The "scientific" community have been so desperate about labelling it as fact that they've redefined what a scientific theory means and are trying to pretend that it's actually a fact, completely disregarding observability and repeatability of the hypothesis. You 'believe' in evolution, I believe in a supernatural creator. We're both believers.
- gaganyaan 4y ago
  That's just not how any of this works. You need to start from scratch and at the very least learn basic terminology before making broad sweeping claims. Saying "Theory, scientific theory, whatever, it's not fact, is it?" means you lack a basic understanding of the topic.
  - mavili 4y ago
    So much delusion, so much effort to make things sound complex and sophisticated to justify your beliefs. A fact is something like the sun existing, giving out heat.. etc. A theory or scientific theory isn't that, is it? So what if there is difference between the terminologies, not that I'm ignorant of the difference but in this context it doesn't matter because neither is fact.

mavili 4y ago

Your comment tells me you have preached this a few times that you've memorised it. I say this because you added "just" when I actually didn't have that in my comment. Read again. "Evolution is a theory and not observable" is not the same as "evolution is JUST a theory". Theory, scientific theory, whatever, it's not fact, is it? The "scientific" community have been so desperate about labelling it as fact that they've redefined what a scientific theory means and are trying to pretend that it's actually a fact, completely disregarding observability and repeatability of the hypothesis. You 'believe' in evolution, I believe in a supernatural creator. We're both believers.

gaganyaan 4y ago
That's just not how any of this works. You need to start from scratch and at the very least learn basic terminology before making broad sweeping claims. Saying "Theory, scientific theory, whatever, it's not fact, is it?" means you lack a basic understanding of the topic.
- mavili 4y ago
  So much delusion, so much effort to make things sound complex and sophisticated to justify your beliefs. A fact is something like the sun existing, giving out heat.. etc. A theory or scientific theory isn't that, is it? So what if there is difference between the terminologies, not that I'm ignorant of the difference but in this context it doesn't matter because neither is fact.