3 ms·
The question is who has the intent here? Netflix clearly and flagrantly enabled this behaviour for many years. Lax security (no 2FA for a long time for example)
by jmacd 4y ago
The question is who has the intent here? Netflix clearly and flagrantly enabled this behaviour for many years. Lax security (no 2FA for a long time for example) and viewer profiles encouraged this behaviour. Further, their plans describe the # of simultaneous streams you get at each tier, they do not describe people or any other constraint.
Netflix had fine print of convenience that banned this behaviour, but at the same time they encouraged it as a growth tactic.
Now that they are choosing to limit this behaviour, doing so under the guise of copyright is disingenuous. I have no idea why the court would entertain them as an aggrieved party.
Sow and reap.