4 ms·
> The 3 most recent nationally representative data sets from NHANES. See also: > "The NHANES dietary data are physiologically implausible and inadmissible as
by hirundo 4y ago
> The 3 most recent nationally representative data sets from NHANES.
See also:
> "The NHANES dietary data are physiologically implausible and inadmissible as scientific evidence" - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573021/
There seems to be an entire industry around extracting nutrition research from these deeply flawed self-reported surveys ... on the grounds that it's the best data we have. Which is like looking for your car keys under the street light because that's where the light is.
So while I sympathize with this story and think it shines light on the process of institutional character assassination, it's about replacing one set of non-probative data with another.
- virtual_void 4y agoDid the paper here use the calorie data from the nhanes dataset? My (perhaps incorrect) understanding was that they used bmi which was measured rather than self reported? I presume you relate this as a critique of self-reported data rather than a critique of the paper in TFA?
- c4ptnjack 4y agoThe article specifically mentions how all the datasets their study used were NOT self reported, but measured. It's one of the biggest arguments for why their study was more trustworthy and why the assumptions/accusations were spurious and baseless