Incorrect. You're making an affirmative claim "X can't happen" in spite of mound of evidence to the contrary. You need to explain why you refute say, the origin

Incorrect. You're making an affirmative claim "X can't happen" in spite of mound of evidence to the contrary. You need to explain why you refute say, the origin of species specifically. This is how scientific criticism/refutation actually works, by pointing out specific issues in the reasoning or methods, not by saying "You're wrong". Let's start with that: Why was Darwin wrong? Take as long as you'd like Here, if we're going to keep going like this please do me a favor and read here: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies. You'll at least be better prepared to deal with the counter-trolling you encounter on message boards.