No, but that's not how science works. The general assumption is that the person making a provable conclusion (ie. that there IS a purpose) has the burden of pro

No, but that's not how science works. The general assumption is that the person making a provable conclusion (ie. that there IS a purpose) has the burden of proof. If I claim to have a magical invisible dragon in my garage it's on me to prove otherwise, not for you to prove it doesn't.