2 ms·

>>Evolution is a theory and is not observable at all. Citation needed...

• mavili 4y ago
  Well, as "scientists" always claim, the onus is on proponents of the theory to show me observable evidence, not me on the lack of it.
  • opportune 4y ago
    You won’t believe it anyway. I can point to SNP mutations leading to macro-scale changes right now - achondroplasia. It’s not worth trying to convince you the obvious implication that concentrating many of these changes in a separate breeding population eventually results in speciation because at this point anybody in denial of evolution is doing so simply on the basis of faith
  • moate 4y ago
    Incorrect. You're making an affirmative claim "X can't happen" in spite of mound of evidence to the contrary. You need to explain why you refute say, the origin of species specifically. This is how scientific criticism/refutation actually works, by pointing out specific issues in the reasoning or methods, not by saying "You're wrong". Let's start with that: Why was Darwin wrong? Take as long as you'd like Here, if we're going to keep going like this please do me a favor and read here: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-logical-fallacies. You'll at least be better prepared to deal with the counter-trolling you encounter on message boards.