3 ms·
UX preferences vary. Imo, hf is too verbose and their pages try to cram in too much information with poor information hierarchy. For example: https://huggingfa
by soraki_soladead 4y ago
UX preferences vary. Imo, hf is too verbose and their pages try to cram in too much information with poor information hierarchy. For example:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/glue https://huggingface.co/datasets/glue
https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/catalog/glue https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/catalog/glue
- jamesblonde 4y agoIn this case, I don't see UIs, i see HF have a 1GB+ dataset that is curated. TF, in contrast, has 10 glue datasets varying from KBs! to 100s of MBs in size. For Glue, HF wins, hands-down, IMO.
- soraki_soladead 4y agoTo each their own. I like that TF separates them since they are separate tasks and combining them is only one use case. At the end of the day we should just use what works best. The ML landscape is far from settled.