3 ms·
I do not have any of direct evidence of anything, I'm just a guy with a brain. This is one of many in a long series of "coincidences" that when put together sta
by willcipriano 4y ago
I do not have any of direct evidence of anything, I'm just a guy with a brain. This is one of many in a long series of "coincidences" that when put together starts to become nonsensical.
Look at where we started.
Pfizer gets fined more beacuse they are a bigger company and have more surface area, the law is complex and everyone is breaking it all the time so action against them doesn't mean they did anything wrong. In and of itself fine, that may be true.
Then those same people will later say, the IRS went after that Mexican restaurant instead of Pfizer beacuse they are so big, and run such a tight ship that it would almost impossible to find any wrong doing.
The tax code is very complex, so is drug regulation. Is the idea that Pfizer is hyper competent in tax law but incompetent when it comes to the core business? That doesn't hold water for me.
- clucas 4y agoMaybe you're right, but I think it's more likely that Pfizer, as a business, is more willing to accept risk in the pursuit of its core business aims than in its accounting, and that's all we're seeing. https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/01/14/too-many-people-dare-call-it-conspiracy/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/01/14/too-many-people-dare-c...
- s1artibartfast 4y agoIt could also be that the endeavor of drug discovery and manufacture is inherently more risky than accounting. From the academic sense, it is not a field of mathematical certainty, but one of subjective risk-benefit tradeoffs.