3 ms·
If it's correct, then it's a wonderful approach. If it's not correct, then HN is the place to find where's the error. By elimination of disjunction, upvote ;)
by qsort 4y ago
If it's correct, then it's a wonderful approach.
If it's not correct, then HN is the place to find where's the error.
By elimination of disjunction, upvote ;)
- EGreg 4y agoHardly I doubt HN is that place Can this also prove the more general Hadwiger's conjecture?
- feet 4y agoWith the amount of incorrect comments I see on HN, definitely not. I'm not saying that I'm not included in that group, but I think we all are
- onos 4y agoAgree on the first part. If correct, it is a wonderful achievement, apparently built upon the work of at least two others.
- gus_massa 4y agoHN is good to spot crackpots, linbait and other kinds of papers that are very bad. This was posted by ColinWright, so my guess is that it's not obviously bad. If it has an error, it will need like a month or a year to be discovered. Anyway, I hope to see in a month a new discussion when Tao (or someone) have enough time to understand it. Edit: Quoting a comment by bakkoting: > Terence Tao is also concerned about that section: https://mathstodon.xyz/@tao/109554420101377184 https://mathstodon.xyz/@tao/109554420101377184 . That's not a good sign.