Your link is to the parent post, not, me, but: “ nobody knows what the liabilities are. At one extreme, if the liabilities are all cash, alameda is in a dire p

Your link is to the parent post, not, me, but: “ nobody knows what the liabilities are. At one extreme, if the liabilities are all cash, alameda is in a dire place. At the other, if the liabilities are just the tokens on their balance sheet, there's nothing particularly interesting. “ Is obviously not a total dismissal - I’m on mobile so can’t scroll around to find my other one but it largely says the same thing. Also, if you can’t really imply anything other than “I’m a shill because I said the balance sheet wasn’t certain evidence of insolvency”, what’s the point? Shill accusations are explicitly called out by dang and the rules for this reason