3 ms·

and as well as discoverability / searchability. how easily it is to find what you're looking for

• dbish 4y ago
  HF datasets have a much better UX for this
  • soraki_soladead 4y ago
    UX preferences vary. Imo, hf is too verbose and their pages try to cram in too much information with poor information hierarchy. For example: https://huggingface.co/datasets/glue https://huggingface.co/datasets/glue https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/catalog/glue https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/catalog/glue
    • jamesblonde 4y ago
      In this case, I don't see UIs, i see HF have a 1GB+ dataset that is curated. TF, in contrast, has 10 glue datasets varying from KBs! to 100s of MBs in size. For Glue, HF wins, hands-down, IMO.
      • soraki_soladead 4y ago
        To each their own. I like that TF separates them since they are separate tasks and combining them is only one use case. At the end of the day we should just use what works best. The ML landscape is far from settled.