2 ms·
My point was more about a local monopoly. If you operate a monopoly, you should relinquish your right to deny whoever you want without cause. I do see your poin
by francisofascii 4y ago
My point was more about a local monopoly. If you operate a monopoly, you should relinquish your right to deny whoever you want without cause. I do see your point about not having the right to be served served alcohol within convenient distance.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoIt sounds like we might agree, but I would further clarify that it depends on the type of Monopoly and viability of alternatives. The water company shouldn't be able to turn off your water because they don't like your associations or unrelated Behavior. However, if a licensed plumber doesn't want to serve your house because of the flag you're flying in front of it, that is fair game. They might be the only plumber in your area, but the state isn't preventing someone else from starting a business For example, if the state is protecting the Monopoly from competition, I don't think they should be able to discriminate. Same with grocery stores. While food is a necessity to live, the state isn't preventing someone else from selling groceries.