2 ms·
> for startups probably not worth the ROI. I definitely agree. That said, I think people seem to forget something. Amazon says: "your instance may go down and
by bretthoerner 15y ago
> for startups probably not worth the ROI.
I definitely agree. That said, I think people seem to forget something.
Amazon says: "your instance may go down and if it does we may just terminate it, reclaiming your ephemeral disk. All data not on EBS will be lost."
Every other host (at least implicitly) says: "your instance/machine may go down, we will attempt to recover your data. The ability and speed depends largely on why the machine went down and whether we run RAID/etc on the machine."
I've waited weeks for a disk repair from very well known/regarded non-Amazon hosts. Redundancy is needed everywhere, not just on Amazon. Bare metal still dies, controllers flake out, networks go down.
- sunsu 15y agoThis is why I'm sticking with EC2 for now as well. Though one of my instances might go down or become unreliable, all I have to do to fix it is Stop and Start it! No messing with support tickets or waiting (sometimes hours) on someone to talk out to the data center to troubleshoot it. Its just fixed.