3 ms·
it was so good if it was security update only and not f-ing up existing functionality - on top of poor security release fixes - and forcing on the user unrelate
by mihaaly 4y ago
it was so good if it was security update only and not f-ing up existing functionality - on top of poor security release fixes - and forcing on the user unrelated and never needed other things as well. this 'security' rasoning for update thing is a big fat lie! do security updates only then!
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- elzbardico 4y agoMost software nowadays is network centric and talk to other computers. Protocols evolve for reasons beyond security, and thus, updating your customer device is required to keep inter-operability
- antihero 4y agoIf they do security updates for obsolete versions of software this means a huge amount of resources testing and developing patches against it that could be spent improving current software.
- mihaaly 4y agoImproving must mean here making even bigger and more complex pile of whatever, making it more vulnerable by complexity and new, barely tested or thought through new versions. We could live without that easily! They could divert resources from "improvements" easily then and consequently making the job of ensuring the quality of already sold vulnerable products to live up to the minimum standards! Testing much much less of existing and broadly distributed products by not making so many obsolete versions so rapidly, putting resources where it counts instead of flashy pile of superficial sh*t! Something truly and reliable useful at last!
- acdha 4y agoRemember that in many cases security fixes involve architectural improvements. You can get those by installing the free system updates and those don’t break existing functionality so it’s understandable that they don’t double the workload by patching very old releases, especially since that’s paying more to have a slower phone with fewer features.