3 ms·

Expect now you need to compile / port everything to WASM+WASI...

• angelmm 4y ago
  Hey! A WasmLabs team member here :). We're planning to port several runtimes as part of our WebAssembly Language Server initiative [1]. Porting things to Wasm+WASI is sometimes challenging. There are some deep-dives in our blog around this topic [2]. [1] https://github.com/vmware-labs/webassembly-language-runtimes/ https://github.com/vmware-labs/webassembly-language-runtimes... [2] https://wasmlabs.dev/articles/php-wasm32-wasi-port/ https://wasmlabs.dev/articles/php-wasm32-wasi-port/
  • zcw100 4y ago
    I'll start by saying I'm a big fan of wasm but just a couple of comments about the articles. I really with the WebAssembly community would stop quoting that tweet from Solomon Hykes. It's taken somewhat out of context and while at the time it was a big shoutout to the wasm underdog it's now a bit over used. Wasm really needs to justify itself with more than just a tweet and I think that it can. "Polyglot - 40+ languages can be compiled to Wasm" is a bit misleading which anyone would see if you listed the 40+ languages. A lot of them are going to be very obscure ones and a lot of the popular ones are on that list. Factually correct but you're just setting people up to be disappointed. "40+ languages oh boy!.....What the heck is Zig? and no Python?!" (yes, I know you can sort of run Python if you run the entire interpreter)
• ridruejo 4y ago
  Right now is tricky and looks like a Rube-Goldberg machine to get many things running. However, it is getting easier and easier to do so. Eventually you will not have to do the compilation itself, but there will be plenty of Wasm binaries ready to use. This will be similar to Linux, most people don't compile the source code for apps from scratch, just use the distro package manager
• ClumsyPilot 4y ago
  Which si way easier than supporting 15,000 distros of linux