3 ms·
Wars are expensive as well. If there's any large scale conflict, expect tax rates to jump through the roof. WW1 and WW2 saw rates go to 94% in the worst (arguab
by AYBABTME 4y ago
Wars are expensive as well. If there's any large scale conflict, expect tax rates to jump through the roof. WW1 and WW2 saw rates go to 94% in the worst (arguably incredibly wealthy) case.
> World War I
In order to finance U.S. participation in World
War One, Congress passed the 1916 Revenue Act,
and then the War Revenue Act of 1917. The highest
income tax rate jumped from 15 percent in 1916
to 67 percent in 1917 to 77 percent in 1918. War
is expensive.
After the war, federal income tax rates took on
the steam of the roaring 1920s, dropping to 25
percent from 1925 through 1931.
> The Depression
Congress raised taxes again in 1932 during the
Great Depression from 25 percent to 63 percent
on the top earners.
> World War II
As we mentioned earlier, war is expensive.
In 1944, the top rate peaked at 94 percent on
taxable income over $200,000 ($2.5 million in
today’s dollars3). That’s a high tax rate.
-> https://bradfordtaxinstitute.com/free_resources/federal-income-tax-rates.aspx https://bradfordtaxinstitute.com/free_resources/federal-inco...
See the historical rates: https://taxfoundation.org/historical-income-tax-rates-brackets/ https://taxfoundation.org/historical-income-tax-rates-bracke...
In my opinion, people aren't ready for a world in which taxes are higher than what they're used to. But peace, and low taxes, are not likely to prevail in a disconnecting, increasingly partisan and hostile world, where most countries are tightening their belts, people are getting poorer and angrier, and tension and hunger for conflict is growing.
- rsync 4y agoThose special tax rates were a form of windfall profit tax to discourage war profiteering. They had nothing to do with raising revenue and were not due to the war "being expensive". They were also not progressive taxation measures and had no social welfare justification (other than, of course, avoiding war profiteering). It is incorrect to compare these wartime rates with current marginal tax rates, etc. In fact, some portion of those taxes paid were eligible for refunds after the war.[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_profits_tax#United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_profits_tax#United_Stat...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- AYBABTME 4y agoThis looks like a different, additional tax to those of the regular income tax rate, aren't they? It appears to me that regular income tax rose to the high levels I shared, in addition to the taxes you shared.
- prewett 4y agoAccording to your quote, it was a 94% tax rate on income above $2.5 million (in today's money). I'd be ecstatic if I had an income of over $2.5 million and had to pay that tax! Although I wouldn't put much effort increasing my income with those tax rates.
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoI'd be delighted to pay a million dollars in taxes next year. I'd love it.