3 ms·
Can you post a link to that study? My first thought is that 1300 cannot be a caloric surplus. 1700 maybe if we are generous with "average-sized" and assume a co
by Vt71fcAqt7 4y ago
Can you post a link to that study? My first thought is that 1300 cannot be a caloric surplus. 1700 maybe if we are generous with "average-sized" and assume a completely sedentary person. To me that just sounds like people who aren't counting properly.