6 ms·
Because they're supposed to be working on their browser, not dicking around with social media.
by groffee 4y ago
Because they're supposed to be working on their browser, not dicking around with social media.
- culi 4y agoSeems like they've been doing a lot of work on their browser. Definitely kept up with Chrome and Safari at least: https://wpt.fyi/interop-2022?stable https://wpt.fyi/interop-2022?stable What exactly is the issue? I don't think just throwing more money or people at that specific work would increase velocity. At a certain point you get too many cooks in the kitchen
- modo_mario 4y agoI think a lot of people are still disappointed that for example servo didn't make it to it's endgoal and the team behind it mostly got fired whilst the CEO increases her compensation, the board expands and money is given to things like letting artists examine ai impact. They want it to outperform chromium browsers instead of implementing 3 separate ways to save tabs across devices. They want firefox to keep up in marketshare because it can keep as much as you want on your scoreboard... If it isn't used it ends up useless, dead and without a hand in webstandards. I still remember how many users it lost because google could switch video compression standards last second because ff could just be ignored leading to countless peers blaming firefox for being laggy with youtube open. It's worse now.
- lern_too_spel 4y agoPresumably, they are planning to get revenue from this instead of having it be a charity.