2 ms·
Not exactly a new concept in law. Take pornography out of it and look at businesses like hooters who can require their waitresses to be attractive to because th
by lovich 4y ago
Not exactly a new concept in law. Take pornography out of it and look at businesses like hooters who can require their waitresses to be attractive to because they are hiring “models” and not regular actors. Their level of attractiveness is explicitly changing the laws involved.
If it’s problematic for you take it up with the courts, these sorts of things were decided long before I was born
- tshaddox 4y agoYour example isn’t at all analogous. Being a waiter doesn’t suddenly become illegal if you’re too attractive.
- lovich 4y agoI don't think we have worldviews that overlap well enough to discuss this then. If you cant see where the logic is coming from, regardless of if you agree with the logic, then I can only point you towards the governments definition of obscenity I linked in my first comment and suggest you read on the legal theory from there.
- tshaddox 4y agoThis seems more like a disagreement about the basic meanings of words, not anything about worldview. In what way is this Hooters employment issue at all similar to this naked yoga issue?
- its-summertime 4y agoBeing hired for looks, not just ability?