4 ms·
In the US, indeed. But in the UK the runner of AI can hold a copyright. Which I think is stupid but that's hardly the first dumb copyright thing.
by mod50ack 4y ago
In the US, indeed. But in the UK the runner of AI can hold a copyright. Which I think is stupid but that's hardly the first dumb copyright thing.
- not2b 4y agoFor something like img2img with Stable Diffusion, if the starting image is copyrighted by someone else I'd expect that the output image is a derivative work of the starting image.
- mod50ack 4y agoThe question is about new copyright in both cases, not subsisting copyright. You hold the copyright to the elements originating with you in a derivative work.